|
The Housing Authority (HA) is a major government organization and
the largest property developer in Hong Kong. Over 50% of the population
is living in the public housing provided by the HA. Up to now, the
HA has accumulated a huge cash reserve with a current total of HK$28
billion. This huge reserve has accumulated mainly from two sources.
One main source is the profit from the disposal of HOS/ PSPS properties.
The other source is the rental income from commercial facilities
owned by the HA. Historically, the income from these two sources
was used to subsidize the expenditures in public housing. Since
these two sources provide a strong income stream, the government
does not need to inject cash into the HA but only to grant lands
for development. Basically, the HA can enjoy a high level of financial
independence.
In terms of having a low amount of government cash subsidy, the
HA was very successful in providing housing solutions to over half
of Hong Kong’s citizens. However, the HA’s self-sustained financial
ability is now facing a big challenge.
Last November, the Secretary for Housing, Planning and Lands announced
the Statement on Housing Policy. The Statement clarified the role
of the Government in the property market and confirmed that the
thrust of the Government’s subsidized housing policy should be to
assist low-income families that cannot afford private rental housing.
On this basis, a number of other measures, directly related to the
work of the HA were also announced, including the cessation of the
production of HOS flats and the suspension of the sale of HOS and
Tenants Purchase Scheme flats.
For this reason alone, the HA projected that in the absence of
other replacement income sources to fund its capital expenditure
on the production of public rental housing flats, the HA will incur
an annual net cash flow deficit. The HA’s cash balance is forecast
to decrease from HK$28 billion, at the moment, to minus $5.5 billion
by march 2006.
In addition, the HA is embarrassed by the losing in the first lawsuit
requesting the HA to bring the rent to a level whereby the Median
Rent-to-Income Ratio (MRIR) of all public housing estates does not
exceed 10%, as required by Section 16(1A) of the Housing Ordinance
Cap 283. The HA has decided to appeal. However, to deal with the
huge political pressure from the tenants, the HA undertook, in the
event of an unsuccessful appeal, to refund to the applicants and
all families affected by the Order of Mandamus, the difference between
the rents at the existing levels and the rent that they should have
been paying together with interest. Should the appeal be unsuccessful,
it is possible that the HA will become a negative asset to the SAR
government and require government direct funding thereafter. Under
the current government’s current situation of having a huge fiscal
deficit, this financial burden from the HA is a real problem.
|